🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the book Authentic, writer Jodi-Ann Burey raises a critical point: typical directives to “be yourself” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they’re traps. This initial publication – a combination of memoir, investigation, cultural critique and conversations – attempts to expose how businesses co-opt identity, shifting the weight of corporate reform on to employees who are already vulnerable.

Career Path and Broader Context

The motivation for the publication originates in part in Burey’s own career trajectory: multiple jobs across corporate retail, emerging businesses and in global development, interpreted via her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The dual posture that Burey experiences – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the core of her work.

It emerges at a moment of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across the United States and internationally, as resistance to diversity and inclusion efforts mount, and many organizations are cutting back the very systems that earlier assured transformation and improvement. Burey delves into that terrain to argue that backing away from authenticity rhetoric – that is, the corporate language that minimizes personal identity as a grouping of aesthetics, quirks and pastimes, leaving workers concerned with managing how they are perceived rather than how they are treated – is not a solution; rather, we should reframe it on our own terms.

Minority Staff and the Performance of Identity

Via vivid anecdotes and conversations, Burey illustrates how employees from minority groups – people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, employees with disabilities – soon understand to adjust which identity will “pass”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by attempting to look acceptable. The practice of “bringing your full self” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of anticipations are projected: emotional work, disclosure and ongoing display of gratitude. In Burey’s words, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but lacking the protections or the trust to survive what emerges.

According to the author, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but without the protections or the confidence to endure what emerges.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

Burey demonstrates this situation through the account of Jason, a deaf employee who decided to inform his colleagues about deaf culture and interaction standards. His willingness to discuss his background – a gesture of candor the office often commends as “sincerity” – for a short time made daily interactions easier. Yet, the author reveals, that advancement was precarious. When personnel shifts wiped out the casual awareness Jason had built, the atmosphere of inclusion dissolved with it. “All the information left with them,” he comments exhaustedly. What remained was the exhaustion of having to start over, of being held accountable for an organization’s educational process. In Burey’s view, this demonstrates to be requested to share personally lacking safeguards: to risk vulnerability in a framework that celebrates your transparency but declines to formalize it into policy. Authenticity becomes a trap when institutions rely on individual self-disclosure rather than organizational responsibility.

Author’s Approach and Idea of Resistance

The author’s prose is at once understandable and expressive. She marries academic thoroughness with a style of kinship: a call for audience to participate, to interrogate, to disagree. For Burey, professional resistance is not noisy protest but ethical rejection – the act of rejecting sameness in environments that demand thankfulness for basic acceptance. To resist, according to her view, is to question the narratives organizations narrate about fairness and acceptance, and to refuse involvement in rituals that perpetuate inequity. It might look like calling out discrimination in a gathering, choosing not to participate of uncompensated “equity” effort, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s personal life is provided to the company. Resistance, the author proposes, is an declaration of personal dignity in spaces that often praise compliance. It is a practice of honesty rather than rebellion, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not conditional on corporate endorsement.

Redefining Genuineness

Burey also rejects brittle binaries. Her work does not simply toss out “genuineness” wholesale: rather, she advocates for its restoration. In Burey’s view, genuineness is not the raw display of character that organizational atmosphere frequently praises, but a more deliberate harmony between one’s values and personal behaviors – a principle that resists distortion by corporate expectations. As opposed to treating authenticity as a mandate to reveal too much or adapt to sterilized models of transparency, the author encourages audience to preserve the elements of it based on sincerity, individual consciousness and moral understanding. From her perspective, the goal is not to give up on genuineness but to relocate it – to transfer it from the executive theatrical customs and toward interactions and organizations where reliance, justice and answerability make {